Main content

The Critical Stance: Ernst Cassirer and the Realist–Empiricist Dispute in the Philosophy of Science

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Mitscherling, Jeff
dc.contributor.advisor Wayne, Andrew
dc.contributor.author Struck, David Brooke
dc.date.accessioned 2015-09-30T17:29:21Z
dc.date.available 2015-09-30T17:29:21Z
dc.date.copyright 2015-09
dc.date.created 2015-09-14
dc.date.issued 2015-09-30
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10214/9282
dc.description.abstract In the contemporary philosophy of science, the champions of the realist–empiricist dispute are structural realism and constructive empiricism, respectively. In establishing their historical lineage, structural realists point to the work of Ernst Cassirer. In this dissertation, I argue that Cassirer cannot be pressed into service to their cause; while some of his conclusions about science seem prima facie in line with structure realism, any such agreement is merely apparent. Digging into Cassirer’s philosophy of science, and situating that work within his broader project of the philosophy of symbolic forms, it becomes clear that his arguments instead present an important challenge to the structural realist camp. In fact, his arguments against abstraction and epistemic foundationalism speak against any assumption of a mind-independent world, undermining the contemporary realist–empiricist dispute in toto. In place of the doctrines of realism and empiricism, Cassirer offers us the system of the symbolic forms. In place of the empirical and metaphysical stances, I develop on Cassirer’s behalf the critical stance, drawing on Cassirer’s appreciation of Kantian transcendentalism and Hegelian dialecticism. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Ontario Graduate Scholarship en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.rights Attribution 2.5 Canada *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ca/ *
dc.subject Cassirer, Ernst en_US
dc.subject Strucutural realism en_US
dc.subject Constructive empiricism en_US
dc.subject Philosophy of science en_US
dc.subject Critical idealism en_US
dc.subject Philosophy of symbolic forms en_US
dc.subject Philosophy en_US
dc.title The Critical Stance: Ernst Cassirer and the Realist–Empiricist Dispute in the Philosophy of Science en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.degree.programme Philosophy en_US
dc.degree.name Doctor of Philosophy en_US
dc.degree.department Department of Philosophy en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Struck_DavidBrooke_201509_PhD.pdf 948.7Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 2.5 Canada Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 2.5 Canada