Main content

The influence of agricultural tillage practices on soil biodiversity

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Hanner, Robert
dc.contributor.advisor Heck, Richard
dc.contributor.author Strohm, Jeff
dc.date.accessioned 2015-05-08T18:31:44Z
dc.date.available 2015-05-08T18:31:44Z
dc.date.copyright 2015-04
dc.date.created 2015-03-27
dc.date.issued 2015-05-08
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10214/8845
dc.description This research was conducted at the Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, Center for Biodiversity Genomics, The University of Guelph. en_US
dc.description.abstract This study was the first to examine the influence of agricultural tillage practices on the entire soil ecosystem using metagenomic techniques. Four genes were chosen to investigate bacterial, fungal and protozoan diversity, while one gene was used for arthropod diversity with all being sequenced at a very high read depth per sample. Four tillage treatments were compared with a no-till treatment, using samples collected from the long term management plots in Elora, Ontario. Overall, the microbial communities of these soils were very similar (p<0.05), but some interesting differences were found with regards to the fungi. Overall, the most diverse fungal group was the Sordariomycetes ( 103±19 mean OTU richness across treatments), and no-till had a significantly lower diversity compared with the tillage treatments (86±10 OTUs; p= 3.12e-3). The fall tillage treatments were the most diverse in terms of the Sordariomycetes (113±16 OTUs), but a large proportion of this diversity were pathogenic genera. Conversely, no-till soils possessed a significantly more diverse community of Dothideomycetes (43±1 vs 29±6; p= 5.54e-5) with the majority of this diversity belonging to the Sporormiella. This genus was essentially absent from the tillage treatments, and even more interestingly, it is known as an obligate coprophilovore. However, manure has never been intentionally applied to these soils. With regards to the arthropod communities, additional mature woodlot samples suggest that even the no-till soils are in a disturbed state. Of the four tillage treatments, spring tandem disc tillage may be the most intense in terms of disturbance to the arthropod community. However, a high degree of between-replicate variability resulted in a lack of statistically significant differences for the arthropods. Overall, no-till or conservation tillage practices are recommended, but the results generated here suggest that they cannot be relied upon to solely increase soil biodiversity. Future research should focus on temporal analyses of biodiversity patterns with special attention paid to analyses that are independent of coarse taxonomic identifications. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This research was funded by The Grain Farmers of Ontario and OMAFRA # 200505 en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ca/ *
dc.subject next generation sequencing en_US
dc.subject plow en_US
dc.subject soil microbiology en_US
dc.subject environmental DNA en_US
dc.subject biodiversity en_US
dc.subject metagenomics en_US
dc.title The influence of agricultural tillage practices on soil biodiversity en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.degree.programme Integrative Biology en_US
dc.degree.name Master of Science en_US
dc.degree.department Department of Integrative Biology en_US
dc.rights.license All items in the Atrium are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Strohm_Jeff_201503_M.Sc.pdf 4.601Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada