Main content

Multidimensional Data-driven Ontology Evaluation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Stacey, Deborah Hlomani, Hlomani 2014-09-02T20:06:51Z 2014-09-02T20:06:51Z 2014-08 2014-08-25 2014-09-02
dc.description.abstract This thesis explores the multiple dimensions to data-driven ontology evaluation. Theoretically and empirically it suggests two ontology evaluation metrics - temporal bias and category bias, as well as an evaluation approach that are geared towards accounting for bias in data-driven ontology evaluation. The topic of ontologies and their development is one that has received wide interest from both academic and industrial domains. The direct results of such a wide interest has been a plethora of ontologies on the web. The success of the semantic web has benefited from this increase in the availability of ontologies. On the other hand, evaluation of these ontologies has proved to be a challenge. From a reuse point of view, the goal has been to sift through related ontologies and decide on which one to reuse. To that end a varied number of approaches to ontology evaluation have been proposed. This thesis focuses on data-driven ontology evaluation, a subset of ontology evaluation that considers knowledge about the domain to evaluate ontologies. While ontologies are a shared knowledge base, they are also created on a specific environmental setting, time, and largely based on the modeller's perception of the domain. Moreover, domain knowledge from which they are based on is non-static and changes over different dimensions. These are the notions that have been overlooked in current research on data-driven ontology evaluation. The ultimate goal is to answer the question: How do the domain knowledge dimensions affect the results of data-driven ontology evaluation? Consequently, the thesis presents a theoretical framework as well as two metrics that account for bias along the dimensions of domain knowledge. Based on the statistical experimentation and evaluation we can conclude that the domain dimensions do bias the evaluation of ontologies. This is especially true in case of the temporal dimension where the ontologies under investigation had shown statistically significant difference in their coverage of the domain at different time intervals. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Botswana International University of Science and Technology (BIUST) en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject Ontology Evaluation en_US
dc.subject Onology en_US
dc.subject Semantic Web en_US
dc.subject Data-driven Ontology Evaluation en_US
dc.subject Knowledge Engineering en_US
dc.title Multidimensional Data-driven Ontology Evaluation en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US Computer Science en_US Doctor of Philosophy en_US School of Computer Science en_US
dc.rights.license All items in the Atrium are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Hlomani_Hlomani_201408_PhD.pdf 2.605Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record