Main content

Unpopular Abolition: Analysis of Canadian Parliament's 1976 Debate to Abolish Capital Punishment

Show full item record

Title: Unpopular Abolition: Analysis of Canadian Parliament's 1976 Debate to Abolish Capital Punishment
Author: Nicholson, Michael
Department: Department of Political Science
Program: Criminology and Criminal Justice Policy
Advisor: Parnaby, PatrickRiddell, Troy
Abstract: The subject of capital punishment receives a great deal of scholarly attention, with emphasis focusing increasingly on its abolition. But very little is known about how governments rationalize the decision to abolish this law, despite public opinion often opposing abolition. This thesis attempts to fill this gap in the literature by exploring Canada’s process of abolishing capital punishment, and how Members of Parliament justified passing legislation that was opposed by a majority of Canadians. Findings based on thematic content analysis reveal that many Members of Parliament employed strategic policy framing in their speeches in attempts to convince members of the legislature to also support their position regarding abolition. Because the issue of capital punishment necessitated a free vote, proponents of abolition used the parliamentary debate to diminish the significance and relevance of public opinion. This thesis concludes by discussing the implications of these findings.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10214/8279
Date: 2014-08
Terms of Use: All items in the Atrium are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.


Files in this item

Files Size Format View Description
Nicholson_Michael_201408_MA.pdf 1.283Mb PDF View/Open Thesis

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record