Main content

Heidegger and Institutional Life: A Critique of Modern Politics

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Russon, John
dc.contributor.author Robertson, Karen
dc.date.accessioned 2014-01-07T20:17:19Z
dc.date.available 2014-01-07T20:17:19Z
dc.date.copyright 2013-12
dc.date.created 2013-11-27
dc.date.issued 2014-01-07
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10214/7773
dc.description.abstract This dissertation interprets Martin Heidegger’s work to understand the institutionally mediated character of our lives and the nature and effect of modern institutions, especially modern political institutions. Chapter One argues that our basic involvement in the world is culturally and historically specific, and that we experience its specificity largely as the sense of the world we take for granted, such that how we become effective and autonomous also gives rise to blind spots with respect to whether our projects measure up adequately to possibilities of our culturally and historically specific moment. Chapter Two argues that Heidegger’s accounts of Being-with and Solicitude allow us to understand our openness to one another as realized in institutions, themselves understood as sites in which we negotiate social roles in the determinate worlds we inherit and perform; relatedly, it argues that institutional criticism begins with an accurate assessment of the contingency of institutional life and that we live up to our constitutive openness to one another when we relate reciprocally in terms of the possibilities afforded to us by our shared institutions. Chapter Three argues that Heidegger’s account of modernity informs an account of distinctly modern institutions that are distinguished from those analysed previously by their instrumental character and their suppression of the significant experience that mediates our worldly interactions. It argues further that even as modern institutions supress our capacity for meaningful experience, they present us with specific resources and with the possibility of deciding responsibly how to orient them. Chapter Four considers modern political institutions by drawing on G.H. Mead’s sociological work to argue that problems besetting modern politics can be addressed by cultivating the appropriate attitude on the part on individuals, and that Heidegger’s work on art and poetry allows us to understand this cultivation in terms of the capacity of the experience of art, especially in the context of culturally rich community life, to awaken us to our nature as interpreters, to the limits of our modern institutions with respect to that nature, and with our responsibility for owning up to possibilities of meaningful life beyond the confines of modern institutions. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Ontario Graduate Scholarship Program en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject Heidegger en_US
dc.subject Intersubjectivity en_US
dc.subject Institutions en_US
dc.subject Philosophy en_US
dc.subject Phenomenology en_US
dc.subject Politics en_US
dc.title Heidegger and Institutional Life: A Critique of Modern Politics en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.degree.programme Philosophy en_US
dc.degree.name Doctor of Philosophy en_US
dc.degree.department Department of Philosophy en_US
dc.rights.license All items in the Atrium are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Robertson_Karen_201312_Phd.pdf 1.398Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record