Self-ratings of counterproductive work behaviour generally do not agree with ratings by peers

Title:	Self-ratings of counterproductive work behaviour generally do not agree with ratings by peers
Author:	Mann, S.L.; Budworth, M.; Ismaila, A.S.; Institute for Community Engaged Scholarship
Abstract:	There was low agreement between self- and peer-ratings of counterproductive work behaviour, with self-ratings reporting much lower levels of counterproductive behaviour. The rater’s own level of counterproductive performance impacted their ratings of others on this measure, suggesting that some peer ratings are less accurate than others.
Description:	This summary is a project of the Institute for Community Engaged Scholarship (ICES) at the University of Guelph, with project partners: the Catalyst Centre, SPARK Program at the University of Guelph, and Knowledge Mobilization Unit at York University. This project is part of the Pan-Canadian Research Impact Network. http://csahs.uoguelph.ca/pps/Clear_Research
URI:	http://hdl.handle.net/10214/6568
Date:	2013-04-23
Terms of Use:	All items in the Atrium are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.