Main content

A platform upgrade will be performed on the Atrium Institutional Repository from Monday, July 13 to Wenesday, July 15, 2020 (inclusive). During this time, users will not be able to submit new items to the Atrium. Users will still be able to browse, view, and download items that are already available in the Atrium. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Pacing polar bears and stoical sheep: testing ecological and evolutionary hypotheses about animal welfare.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mason, G.J.
dc.contributor.author Clubb, R.
dc.date.accessioned 2012-12-01T20:20:17Z
dc.date.available 2012-12-01T20:20:17Z
dc.date.issued 2004
dc.identifier.citation R. Clubb & G. Mason (2004). Pacing polar bears and stoical sheep: testing ecological and evolutionary hypotheses about animal welfare. Animal Welfare 13: S33 – S40. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10214/4717
dc.description.abstract Responses to potential threats to welfare vary greatly between species. Even closely related animals often differ in their fear of humans and/or novelty; their behavioural responses to pain; and when captive, their overall welfare and the form and frequency of their stereotypies. Such species differences stimulate hypotheses about 1) the way that responses to challenge co-vary with other biological traits; 2) the adaptive value of particular responses; and 3) the factors predicting responses to evolutionarily new scenarios, such as captivity. We illustrate how these ideas can be statistically tested with multi-species comparisons, and show how techniques such as the Comparative Analysis of Independent Contrasts can be used to control for any non-independence of data points caused by species’ relatedness. For each of the three types of hypothesis, we then provide several welfare-relevant examples including one that has been fully tested (respectively, the relationships between sociality and anti-predator behaviour in antelopes; predation pressure, foraging niche and neophobia in parrots; and home range size and stereotypy in carnivores). Ultimate explanations such as these, based on species’ ecology and evolutionary history, have great explanatory appeal. Species comparisons can also have great practical value, allowing the test of hypotheses that would be almost impossible to investigate experimentally, and generating principles that allow predictions about the welfare of similar unstudied species. Multi species data, for example from the many taxa held in zoos, thus hold enormous potential for increasing the fundamental understanding of animal welfare. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Animal Welfare en_US
dc.subject animal welfare en_US
dc.subject comparative methods en_US
dc.subject ecological niche en_US
dc.subject evolution en_US
dc.subject species differences en_US
dc.subject stereotypy en_US
dc.title Pacing polar bears and stoical sheep: testing ecological and evolutionary hypotheses about animal welfare. en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.contributor.affiliation Department of Animal and Poultry Science
dc.rights.license All items in the Atrium are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.


Files in this item

Files Size Format View Description
Clubb_-&_Mason_An_Welfare_se.pdf 97.24Kb PDF View/Open Pacing polar bears and stoical sheep: testing ecological and evolutionary hypotheses about animal welfare.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record