Main content

A platform upgrade will be performed on the Atrium Institutional Repository from Monday, July 13 to Wenesday, July 15, 2020 (inclusive). During this time, users will not be able to submit new items to the Atrium. Users will still be able to browse, view, and download items that are already available in the Atrium. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

A Case for Decision-Maker Obligation Based Justification of Environmental Policy

Show full item record

Title: A Case for Decision-Maker Obligation Based Justification of Environmental Policy
Author: Robertson, Jamie Kathleen
Department: Department of Philosophy
Program: Philosophy
Advisor: Linquist, Stefan
Abstract: The environment is seen by different people as being valuable for different reasons. A pervasive debate in Environmental Philosophy revolves around which values should hold sway in the case of conflicts between the various kinds of value associated with the environment. This debate is relevant to, and fuelled by, debates how human communities should make decisions about the environment. By exploring the methods for balancing the various forms of environmental value proposed by Bryan G. Norton, Mark Sagoff, and David Pearce, I will argue that, as of yet, there has been little progress towards constructing a morally satisfactory basis for giving particular environmental values more weight than others. I will argue that to the extent that decision-maker obligations constitute moral obligations to the community, they can act as a basis for justifying giving some environmental values precedence over others in the decision-making context.
Date: 2011-09
Terms of Use: All items in the Atrium are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
JRobertson-ThesisFinalVersion.pdf 629.4Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record