Abstract:
|
Computational Thinking (CT) is crucial in today’s world, but the lack of a shared
paradigm poses challenges for researchers addressing key issues like effective teaching. Di-
verse stakeholder motivations further complicate consensus on definitions, methods, and
metrics. This research proposes a CT meta-framework, integrating cognitive science and
stakeholder hypotheses, to disambiguate definitions and clarify experimental methods for a
CT transfer experiment. The framework’s success is measured by its ability to disambiguate
transfer and algorithm definitions, determine an algorithmic thinking metric, and design a
transfer case study method.
The research involves three steps: 1) literature review and coding to identify CT per-
spectives and provide nomenclature for them; 2) integrating cognitive science concepts to
develop the CT meta-framework; and 3) applying the meta-framework in a transfer case
study to disambiguate definitions and identify limitations. This research aims to bridge the
gap between CT perspectives and facilitate a more cohesive approach to CT research and
education. |