Main content

Using accelerometers to examine differences in inactivity between conventional and slower growing broiler chickens

Show full item record

Title: Using accelerometers to examine differences in inactivity between conventional and slower growing broiler chickens
Author: Dawson, Lauren; Liu, Zhenzhen; Widowski, Tina; Torrey, Stephanie
Department: Department of Animal Biosciences
Abstract: Selection for rapid muscle growth has led to larger, more efficient broiler chickens; however, conventional broiler chickens (CONV) experience health and welfare issues, which may cause or be caused by higher levels of inactivity. As such, there has been increasing interest in using slower growing broiler strains (SLOW) for commercial production. As part of a large-scale study, our objective was to compare the inactivity levels of 14 broiler strains (2 CONV, ADG0-47 = 66-69 g/day; 12 SLOW, ADG0-61 = 44-56 g/day). Each strain, raised under similar conditions (30 kg/m2), was assessed over 3 replicates, in 4 pens per replicate in a randomised incomplete block design. One male and one female per pen (n = 153 pens; 138 males, 142 females; 14-24 birds/strain) were outfitted with omni-directional accelerometers (Actical®; frequency 0.035-3.5 Hz, range 0.05-2 G) to continuously monitor activity from day 22 to 46; accelerometers were previously validated through video analysis. The number of 15-second epochs with no activity were summed per day per bird and analysed using a repeated measures generalised linear mixed model. For analyses, SLOW strains were further categorised as fast SLOW (FSLOW, ADG0-61 = 54-56 g/day), moderate SLOW (MSLOW, ADG0-61= 50-51 g/day) and slow SLOW (S-SLOW, ADG0-61 = 44-48 g/day). Overall, CONV birds were inactive for 18.4 ± 0.6 h per day, whereas SLOW birds were inactive for 17.4 ± 0.6 h per day (p = 0.07). Inactivity increased with age (p < 0.01), and females were more inactive than males (p < 0.01). At the same age, CONV chickens were more inactive than S-SLOW chickens until day 35 (p < 0.01). At the same target body weight (~2.1 kg; d34 for CONV, d48 for SLOW), CONV birds were less inactive than S-SLOW (p < 0.01), M-SLOW (p < 0.01) and F-SLOW birds (p < 0.01), but the inactivity levels of the S-SLOW, M-SLOW and F-SLOW birds were similar (all p > 0.05). At a higher body weight (~3.5 kg; d48 for CONV, d62 for SLOW), there were no differences in inactivity between strain categories. Results suggest that strain differences in inactivity may initially be due to differences in the speed of growth, with later increases in inactivity due to both age and increasing body weight. Wearable accelerometers permit the continuous monitoring of broilers to identify activity patterns that may be proxies for welfare, such as long durations of inactivity, which may be associated with poor leg health or a reduced physical ability to perform natural behaviours.
Description: Abstract for oral presentation presented at PSA annual meeting (virtual conference) 2020.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10214/26545
Date: 2020-07
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Related Publications: Dawson, L., Liu, Z., Widowski, T., Torrey, S. (2020, July 20-22). Using accelerometers to examine differences in inactivity between conventional and slower growing broiler chickens [Conference presentation]. Poultry Science Association Annual Meeting 2020. Virtual meeting.


Files in this item

Files Size Format View Description
Abstract_Inactivity_Dawson_et_al_PSA_July2020.pdf 32.61Kb PDF View/Open Abstract for virtual presentation presented at annual Poultry Science congress (Virtual Conference). 2020

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International