Main content

Quantitative and qualitative comparison of three wet aggregate stability methods using a long-term tillage system and crop rotation experiment

Show full item record

Title: Quantitative and qualitative comparison of three wet aggregate stability methods using a long-term tillage system and crop rotation experiment
Author: Van Eerd, L.L.; DeBruyn, A.H.; Ouellette, L.; Hooker, D.C.; Robinson, D.E.
Abstract: Automated wet-sieving is preferred for this clay loam soil due to better sensitivity and savings (time and disposables) despite a larger capital investment. Rotations with greater frequency of winter wheat and no-till com-pared with conventional plow system had greater wet aggregate stability values, indicating better surface soil quality.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10214/21251
Date: 2018
Terms of Use: All items in the Atrium are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.
Related Publications: L.L. Van Eerd, A.H. DeBruyn, L. Ouellette, D.C. Hooker, D.E. Robinson (2018). Quantitative and qualitative comparison of three wet aggregate stability methods using a long-term tillage system and crop rotation experiment. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 98(4), 738–742. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjss-2018-0101


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
VanEerdEtAl_101139cjss20180101.pdf 248.4Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

The library is committed to ensuring that members of our user community with disabilities have equal access to our services and resources and that their dignity and independence is always respected. If you encounter a barrier and/or need an alternate format, please fill out our Library Print and Multimedia Alternate-Format Request Form. Contact us if you’d like to provide feedback: lib.a11y@uoguelph.ca  (email address)