Main content

A platform upgrade will be performed on the Atrium Institutional Repository from Monday, July 13 to Wenesday, July 15, 2020 (inclusive). During this time, users will not be able to submit new items to the Atrium. Users will still be able to browse, view, and download items that are already available in the Atrium. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

The Legitimacy of ‘Compassionate Mix’: Post-Revanchist Urban Policy and Bottom-up Influence in Downtown Oshawa, Ontario

Show full item record

Title: The Legitimacy of ‘Compassionate Mix’: Post-Revanchist Urban Policy and Bottom-up Influence in Downtown Oshawa, Ontario
Author: Wykes, Timothy G.
Department: Department of Sociology and Anthropology
Program: Sociology
Advisor: Morton, Mavis
Abstract: Social mix has emerged as a consensus ‘top-down’ approach in urban policies throughout the Global North and beyond. In Ontario, Canada, the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2017) has legislated for urban growth centres (UGCs), which are existing or emerging downtowns like Downtown Oshawa, to achieve ‘balance’, ‘variety’, and/or ‘diversity’ by planning “complete communities”. In this context, Downtown Oshawa is undergoing a transition that resonates with post-revanchist understandings of contemporary gentrification. Specifically, local policies pledge to uphold ‘compassionate’ commitments to vulnerable populations while enticing relatively affluent newcomers. Informed by the theoretical framework of ‘everyday’ international political economy (EIPE), and adopting a critical realist grounded theory (CRGT) methodology, this qualitative case study set upon two objectives: (1) to determine if ‘everyday’ agents in Downtown Oshawa perceive ‘compassionate mix’ policies as legitimate; and (2) to establish what, if any, influence agents’ ‘bottom-up’ responses exerted. It contributes to extant literature by foregrounding the perceived policy legitimacy of non-elite agents and examining if and how their responses influenced practices and relations downtown. The results centre interviews (n = 25) with ‘everyday’ agents, or dwellers, who regularly spent time in Downtown Oshawa, as well as over 100 hours of observational fieldwork and a review of policies, legislation, and newspaper articles. Findings suggest that dwellers expressed a deep ambivalence captured by the EIPE concept of legitimation gaps. Specifically, dwellers endorsed local policies’ pledges to enhance the downtown reputation, import employment opportunities, and improve social control. However, rather than achieving these goals, dwellers experienced a variety of hardships associated with gentrification, including but not limited to a loss of place identity. Further, dwellers engaged in a variety of axiorational behaviours to compensate for perceived shortcomings in ‘compassionate’ service provisioning, including selective affiliation, holding ‘unconditional love’ and sustenance rallies for the vulnerable, and lending beds to others with insecure shelter. I situate these findings within broader academic discussions on resistance, gentrification, and poverty management before exploring alternative policy solutions to structurally address dwellers’ needs and frustrations.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10214/18034
Date: 2020-06
Terms of Use: All items in the Atrium are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Wykes_Timothy_202006_PhD.pdf 2.069Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record