Main content

Note-Taking for the Win: Doodling Does not Reduce Boredom or Improve Retention of Lecture Material

Show full item record

Title: Note-Taking for the Win: Doodling Does not Reduce Boredom or Improve Retention of Lecture Material
Author: Spencer Mueller, Emily Krysten
Department: Department of Psychology
Program: Psychology
Advisor: Fenske, Mark
Abstract: Doodling and fidgeting—traditionally viewed in educational contexts as markers of inattention and poor classroom behaviour—have more recently been considered as possible routes to improve performance by reducing boredom and its negative impact on memory. However, there is a surprising lack of well-controlled studies examining this possibility, despite the widespread adoption of fidget toys and doodling exercises within classroom settings. Here I report two experiments (total N = 222) that assess the impact of doodling on boredom, attention, mindwandering and subsequent recall of auditory information. In Experiment 1, participants first listened to a 15-minute section of a lecture known to induce boredom. Immediately afterwards, they were asked to jot down important information from a short voicemail while either doodling (add shading to shapes) or doing nothing in between note-taking. In Experiment 2, participants listened to the same lecture for 45 minutes under one of four conditions: structured doodling (i.e., shade in shapes), unstructured doodling, note-taking, or listen-only. Thought probes assessed levels of boredom, attention, and mindwandering throughout the lecture. Across studies, doodling neither reduced boredom nor increased retention of information compared to other conditions. In contrast, test performance and attention were highest (and mindwandering lowest) for those focused on note-taking.
Date: 2019-06-18
Terms of Use: All items in the Atrium are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.

Files in this item

Files Size Format View Description
SpencerMueller_EmilyKrysten_201906_Msc.pdf 1.393Mb PDF View/Open Thesis

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

The library is committed to ensuring that members of our user community with disabilities have equal access to our services and resources and that their dignity and independence is always respected. If you encounter a barrier and/or need an alternate format, please fill out our Library Print and Multimedia Alternate-Format Request Form. Contact us if you’d like to provide feedback:  (email address)