Main content

Misuse of the null hypothesis in data reporting and interpretation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author King, Donald E.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-03-14T17:50:40Z
dc.date.available 2019-03-14T17:50:40Z
dc.date.copyright 1992
dc.date.created 1992-12
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10214/15784
dc.description.abstract The concept of analytical method detection capability (MDC), has been adopted for several decades as the basis for determining measurement reporting limits. One outcome has been inadequate control of method performance at low-levels. As a result, the frequently poor comparability of such data among laboratories, has led to the introduction of progressively higher data reporting limits and the consequent loss or degradation of potentially valuable low-level environmental data. This paper proposes that the statistical process behind this concept of detection has been misunderstood and misapplied. It reviews the application of the 'null' hypothesis, in particular the requirement that this hypothesis be the opposite of what one suspects to be true. The traditional approach applies to the case where an analyte is known to be very probably present (conventional parameters, nutrients, and major ions). But in other cases, (ultra-trace contaminants in drinking water), we know that the analyte is present at levels below our analytical capability to measure. Therefore the statistical process and logic must be inverted. This paper affirms, on a statistical basis, the need to report low-level data, and disavows the application of reporting limits at levels any higher than 3 times the method repeatability as estimated by the within-run standard deviation (Sw). It supports the reporting of low-level estimates, and the adoption of four generic reference points for data interpretation: W (between Sw/2 and Sw), CD (= 3 Sw), DL (= 6 Sw), and QL (=12 Sw).
dc.format pdf
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Ontario Ministry of the Environment
dc.rights Queen's Printer for Ontario, Crown Copyright, Non-Commercial Use Permitted
dc.rights.uri https://www.ontario.ca/page/copyright-information-c-queens-printer-ontario
dc.subject detection
dc.subject method detection capability
dc.subject data reporting
dc.subject data interpretation
dc.subject null hypothesis
dc.subject criteria for detection
dc.subject detection limit
dc.subject within-run estimate of standard deviation
dc.title Misuse of the null hypothesis in data reporting and interpretation
dc.type Report
dc.rights.holder Queen's Printer for Ontario
dc.contributor.affiliation Laboratory Services Branch, Ontario Ministry of the Environment
dc.rights.license All items in the Atrium are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
OME_misuse_null_hypothesis_92.pdf 642.1Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record