Main content

Response of earthworms, soil biota, and soil structure to agricultural practices in corn, soybean ad cereal rotations

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Tomlin, A. D.
dc.contributor.author Tu, C. M.
dc.contributor.author Miller, J. J.
dc.contributor.author DaFonseca, J.
dc.coverage.spatial Ontario
dc.date.accessioned 2018-11-02T18:07:06Z
dc.date.available 2018-11-02T18:07:06Z
dc.date.copyright 1993
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10214/14375
dc.description.abstract Conventional cropping systems require substantial herbicide input for weed control, and reduced or zero-till methods use herbicides to prepare the seed-bed for direct drilling. The comparative effects of herbicide treatments, crop rotations and weed control practice on soil fauna, microflora, and soil microfabric features (eg. soil particle size and shape) were measured in a multifactorial experimental design. The effects of organic insecticides and fungicides on earthworms and other soil fauna have been widely reported in the literature, but effects of herbicides on soil fauna are rarely studied because destruction of vegetation by the herbicide reduces soil faunal populations inhabiting the soil beneath the vegetation, thus masking herbicide toxicity. Generally, soil fauna responds to less intensive tillage methods by increasing in abundance, biomass and diversity, and this has been clearly demonstrated for earthworms. Increases in earthworm abundance and biomass under low or zero tillage are usually accompanied by increased soil macroporosity and increased water infiltration rates into soil. Because of the extensive availability of nutrients in earthworm casts both at the surface and within the burrows, agronomic techniques enhancing or reducing earthworm populations have significant consequences for processes involving soil microflora and soil microfauna colonizing the burrows. We have been able to develop methods of measuring the effects of agronomic practices on microfabric soil physical features (eg. soil aggregates and voids) using image analysis techniques. We now more clearly understand how the abiotic physical environment of soil interacts with agronomic practices. We can use the same image analysis techniques at microfabric scale to trace the impact of biotic contributions to soil microfabric and structure. This is a real advance because most soil biological processes are poorly understood. These tools will allow us to construct a more complete picture of soil processes and soil ecosystem function.
dc.format pdf
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Agriculture Canada
dc.rights In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted
dc.rights.uri https://www.canada.ca/en/transparency/terms.html
dc.subject soil quality
dc.subject herbicides
dc.subject crop rotations
dc.subject weed control
dc.subject soil fauna
dc.subject microflora
dc.subject soil microfabric
dc.subject insecticides
dc.subject fungicides
dc.title Response of earthworms, soil biota, and soil structure to agricultural practices in corn, soybean ad cereal rotations
dc.type Report
dc.rights.holder Agriculture Canada
dc.contributor.affiliation London Research Centre, Agriculture Canada


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
nscp_biota.pdf 141.0Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

The library is committed to ensuring that members of our user community with disabilities have equal access to our services and resources and that their dignity and independence is always respected. If you encounter a barrier and/or need an alternate format, please fill out our Library Print and Multimedia Alternate-Format Request Form. Contact us if you’d like to provide feedback: lib.a11y@uoguelph.ca  (email address)