Main content

Why does natural home range size predict captive Carnivora welfare?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Mason, Georgia Bandeli, Miranda 2018-05-08T14:34:08Z 2018-05-08T14:34:08Z 2018-05 2018-04-27 2018-05-08
dc.description.abstract Natural ranging behaviours were investigated as risk factors for stereotypic behaviour (SB) and infant mortality (CIM) in captive Carnivora. Data collected via literature searches were added into previously created databases. Species-typical median home range size predicted stereotypic route-tracing, but not total SB or CIM. I then assessed whether any correlates of range size proved better predictors of route-tracing. No correlates statistically eliminated the effect of range size, but two greatly increased the R2 when combined with range size: wide-ranging species that are also not predated and travel a small proportion of their annual distance daily spent the most time route-tracing. Additionally, ranging flexibility proved important: species with large home ranges that also have little variability in their range sizes spent the most time route-tracing. However, since the effect of home range size on route-tracing was not explained by any correlate tested, home range size may be intrinsically important. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.subject captivity en_US
dc.subject Carnivora en_US
dc.subject PGLS en_US
dc.subject route-tracing en_US
dc.subject pacing en_US
dc.title Why does natural home range size predict captive Carnivora welfare? en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US Animal and Poultry Science en_US Master of Science en_US Department of Animal Biosciences en_US
dc.rights.license All items in the Atrium are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.

Files in this item

Files Size Format View Description
Bandeli_Miranda_201805_Msc.pdf 1.516Mb PDF View/Open Master's thesis

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record