Costs and Benefits of Key Audit Matter Reporting for Smaller Public Entities: The Australian Experience

dc.contributor.authorPries, Fred
dc.contributor.authorScott, Sandra
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-17T17:54:32Z
dc.date.available2018-09-17T17:54:32Z
dc.date.created2018-09
dc.date.issued2018-09-17
dc.degree.departmentDepartment of Managementen_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this analysis is to gather evidence regarding the costs and benefits of key audit matter (KAM) reporting for smaller public entities. We examined 362 Australian listed entities with year ends between December 15, 2016 and December 15, 2017 and with market capitalization of less than AUD$10 million. We found no significant impact on audit fees with the introduction of KAM reporting for the entities examined. We also found that KAM reporting provided an effective ‘signal’ to readers of the key audit issues that arose. However, in certain situations, we found that KAM reporting did not provide ‘transparency’ about those key audit issues. Based on the Australian experience, we conclude that there is value to KAM reporting by smaller listed entities and that the value could be increased if KAM reporting were more transparent.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10214/14306
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights.licenseAll items in the Atrium are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.
dc.subjectauditor reportingen_US
dc.subjectkey audit mattersen_US
dc.titleCosts and Benefits of Key Audit Matter Reporting for Smaller Public Entities: The Australian Experienceen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
AustralianKAMExperience20180905.pdf
Size:
628.47 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.74 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections