A randomized controlled trial evaluating a pain assessment and management program for respite workers supporting children with disabilities Part two: Training evaluations and the impact of training on knowledge application.
dc.contributor.author | Genik, Lara | |
dc.contributor.author | McMurtry, Meghan | |
dc.contributor.author | Aerts, Elisabeth | |
dc.contributor.author | Nauman, Hiba | |
dc.contributor.author | Barney, Chantel | |
dc.contributor.author | Lewis, Stephen | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-24T19:11:55Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2020 | |
dc.date.created | 2020 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.degree.department | Department of Psychology | en |
dc.description.abstract | Pain training may improve respite workers’ (RW) knowledge and self-reported confidence and skill; however, little is known about pain training impact on skill application in respite contexts. Objectives: Within a parallel group RCT comparing pain and control training, this paper reports: (1) pain training impact on RW pain assessment and management approaches, and (2) training evaluations. Methods: RW (n = 158) from fourteen organizations received pain or control training following randomization with sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. Researchers were blind until randomization; allocations were not shared explicitly with organizations and participants. Immediately before either training, participants completed a strategy use questionnaire. Evaluations were provided immediately after training. Four-to-six weeks after either training, participants again completed the strategy use questionnaire and semi-structured focus groups. Results: No differences in participant’s pain approaches were noted in strategy use questionnaires. Common and unique approaches between groups emerged from qualitative focus group analyses. Both groups had similar approaches for developing a ‘knowing’ about pain and applied similar approaches in practice. Participants receiving the pain training also identified the importance of ‘growing and strengthening’ their pain knowledge. Training endorsements were favorable. Discussion: Findings demonstrate the value of pain training for RW and potential impact on practice. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Genik, L. McMurtry, M. Aerts, E. Nauman, H. Barney, C. Lewis, S. 2020. A randomized controlled trial evaluating a pain assessment and management program for respite workers supporting children with disabilities Part two: Training evaluations and the impact of training on knowledge application. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. [Manuscript accepted]. | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10214/24151 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.rights.license | All items in the Atrium are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated. | |
dc.subject | pain | en_US |
dc.subject | children | en_US |
dc.subject | intellectual disability | en_US |
dc.subject | developmental disability | en_US |
dc.subject | education | en_US |
dc.subject | respite workers | en_US |
dc.title | A randomized controlled trial evaluating a pain assessment and management program for respite workers supporting children with disabilities Part two: Training evaluations and the impact of training on knowledge application. | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en |
Files
Original bundle
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.74 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: