Response inhibition devalues sexual stimuli and alters their capacity to elicit subjective arousal and behavioural approach or avoidance

dc.contributor.advisorFenske, Mark
dc.contributor.authorDriscoll, Rachel
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-24T13:36:15Z
dc.date.available2018-08-24T13:36:15Z
dc.date.copyright2018-08
dc.date.created2018-08-10
dc.date.issued2018-08-24
dc.degree.departmentDepartment of Psychologyen_US
dc.degree.grantorUniversity of Guelphen_US
dc.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.degree.programmePsychologyen_US
dc.description.abstractStimuli that are ignored or from which a motor response is withheld receive more negative affective ratings than the targets of attention or response, and are less likely to elicit behavioural approach. Inhibition is the mechanism thought to trigger such effects; however, it remains unclear whether the impact of response inhibition is due to changes in stimulus value, or to other consequences of motor suppression. Resolving this uncertainty is important because representations of stimulus value are thought to provide a universal currency on which a much wider array of thought and behaviour is based than that impacted by other more restricted effects of motor-suppression. My thesis research addresses this issue directly in Experiment 1 using sexual stimuli in a paradigm that combines a response inhibition task with a new key-pressing task that measures both behavioural approach and avoidance. Evidence that prior response inhibition leads to increases in motivation to escape views of unappealing images suggests that response inhibition alters stimulus value, and does not produce a lingering global brake on motor responses that would reduce all behavioural expression. Following from this, Experiments 2 and 3 explore the extent to which the representations of value altered by response inhibition drive fundamental forms of biologically-significant responses. The results demonstrated that prior response inhibition reduces the capacity of both sexually-explicit images (Exp. 2) and video clips (Exp. 3) to elicit feelings of sexual arousal. These findings demonstrate that the type of stimulus- value representations altered by response inhibition are likely to support a wide range of thoughts, feelings, and behaviour, including those as biologically-significant as sexual response.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSocial Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada
dc.description.sponsorshipJoseph-Armand Bombardier Canada Graduate Scholarship
dc.description.sponsorshipOntario Graduate Scholarship
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10214/14096
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Guelphen_US
dc.rights.licenseAll items in the Atrium are protected by copyright with all rights reserved unless otherwise indicated.
dc.subjectresponse inhibitionen_US
dc.subjectsexual arousalen_US
dc.subjectbehavioural motivationen_US
dc.subjectstimulus valueen_US
dc.titleResponse inhibition devalues sexual stimuli and alters their capacity to elicit subjective arousal and behavioural approach or avoidanceen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Driscoll_Rachel_201808_PhD.pdf
Size:
834.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: